One of the major issues addressed at the January 7, 2025, Wayzata City Council meeting was the approval of the city’s legislative priorities, which centered on infrastructure improvements, local tax proposals, and considerations for future public safety needs. While most priorities advanced with ease, some council members raised questions about the inclusion of design costs for a potential new public safety facility in the city’s bonding request.
The council approved a $15 million bonding request covering Panoway’s next phase, improvements to Klapprich Park, Wayzata Beach, and Shaver Park, as well as $2 million for public safety facility design. However, the inclusion of the latter sparked concerns about readiness.
Council Member Jeff Parkhill remarked, “The public safety facility is not something the council has discussed. I think we should address it before we begin lobbying for it. Right now, I don’t know much about it—just that it’s apparently in the capital plan for 10 years down the road or so. It’s important for us to dig into these capital expenditures before we lobby for them.”
Council Member Alex Plechash added, “I think that’s a reasonable point to note. It probably doesn’t change the fact that we’d still like to request $15 million from the state and then decide how to allocate it. That said, we’re unlikely to get the full $15 million—probably something less, if anything at all. However, he makes a valid point: we haven’t discussed this in depth. We should address it before listing it as a legislative priority for our lobbyists.”
City Manager Jeff Dahl explained the request, “…that’s exactly what we started to discuss in December—can it hurt to leave it on the list? We acknowledged that we don’t yet know what the needs assessment will reveal, so it might be premature. However, removing it now would mean reducing the bonding request by two million dollars, as every part of the request must be allocated to a specific expense. While we could revisit this next year, leaving it on for now provides flexibility, even though we still need significant engagement with the council and the community to refine the details.”
Despite these reservations, the council opted to keep the item in the bonding request to maintain flexibility.
Local Sales Tax and Community Engagement
The council also supported lifting the state’s moratorium on local sales taxes, advocating for a food and beverage tax to offset operational and capital costs. The proposed tax would primarily target visitors, with minimal impact on residents.
Engagement with the local business community remains a priority. Council members discussed the importance of explaining the tax’s purpose and benefits to restaurant owners and other stakeholders before advancing the proposal, indicating that City staff should meet with all restaurant owners willing to meet so as to have the support of the community in place.
Advocating for Local Control of Fees and Fines
A final priority emphasized the city’s desire for greater local control over fines and fees for nuisance issues, such as noise and e-bike violations. This measure would address challenges caused by Wayzata’s influx of visitors.
Next Steps
The council unanimously approved the draft priorities, directing staff and lobbyists to advocate during the upcoming legislative session.
“This list ensures that Wayzata’s long-term needs remain front and center as we engage with state lawmakers,” MayorAndrew Mullin concluded.
The Wayzata City Council, in a 3-1 split vote, approved $165,830.98 in change orders for the PanowayLakewalk project during their November 12 meeting. The vote highlighted ongoing concerns about project oversight, contingency planning, and the transparency of financial decisions.
Change Orders and Costs
The approved change orders addressed unforeseen construction issues, including:
Pile Obstruction ($18,498.15): Removal of a boulder obstructing pile installation.
Ice Breaking ($22,228.93): Clearing ice to allow for precast beam placement during winter.
Hydrocrane Setup ($23,091.97): Required crane work to place beams near the railroad due to winter conditions.
Remaining Acceleration ($60,441.93): Costs tied to an additional barge and crane to expedite work.
Railing Stiffeners ($41,570): Reinforcements added to address structural concerns with cable rail tensioning.
These costs pushed the project beyond its contingency funds, raising questions among council members about planning and accountability.
Budget Overview
City staff reported that the Panoway project remains $55,436 under budget, aided by a $258,971 sales tax credit and reallocated resources. However, the original contingency—a modest 3.8% of the total budget—was exhausted early, necessitating council approval for subsequent expenses.
Some council members questioned the decision-making process, with Council Member Ken Sorensen stating, “If this is work that wasn’t in the contractor’s contract, and it should be very clear if it was or wasn’t, the city probably owes them that money.” Sorensen continued, “I think the issue is, why do we incur these change orders and have they been appropriately scrutinized?”
Discussion on Accountability
Concerns were raised about the transparency of decision-making, particularly regarding the responsibilities of designers and contractors.
Council Member Jeff Parkhill remarked, “I think maybe we were a little optimistic on the 4% contingency. That may have been oversight by anybody involved with this. I’m feeling the same way about not being involved in some of these decisions, and for example maybe we could have gotten rid of the step downs if we knew they were going to cost us, x amount per year, an amount that wasn’t budgeted for and an additional $63,000. I know in building there is always unforeseeable things…“
“At this point I don’t think we have a choice, I think we have to pay for this but I think my biggest request is some transparency and clarity. We are up here forced to make a decision after the fact and it’s really not fair to us, it’s not fair to the community either,” continued Parkhill. “Watching some of these budgets go through it’s like holy smokes… it’s a bureaucracy.”
City staff acknowledged that some issues stemmed from unforeseen conditions, such as DNR permitting delays and deeper-than-expected piling requirements. Bob Janssen from Kraus-Anderson added that the project’s unique nature introduced risks that were difficult to anticipate.
Council Member Molly MacDonald questioned the step down change orders and work that appears to have been stopped, “I’ve noticed some of this skeleton down there that has been started, there’s a large piece of equipment that is sitting behind a sidewalk closed sign for quite some time.” MacDonald continued, “These design changes have not been seen by this body, will that skeleton down there, will that always be there?“
Mouton stated in response, “Decisions are being made outside of the purview of the council, I think is what I am hearing from council member MacDonald, and this council will be asked to approve the cost, we haven’t seen the design revisions, we don’t know any information about it, again, seems like there is a bit of a disconnect, being asked to approve something after the fact… it’s too little too late.“
Future Implications
The council also discussed pending change orders, particularly related to step-down adjustments for seasonal removability, which are under review. Council members expressed frustration at not being consulted earlier, with Mayor Mouton stating, “I don’t think I’ve ever seen this process play out this way.” Mounton continued, “I’m not comfortable saying yes to $165,000, this is work that is already done.“
Council Vote
The motion passed 3-1, with Mayor Mouton opposing. She expressed concerns about relying on funds not yet received and criticized the piecemeal presentation of information. Council Member Parkhill supported the motion but shared dissatisfaction with the process, saying, “We’re left to approve bills for work already completed, and that’s a difficult position to be in.”
Despite the challenges, the council remains committed to completing the Panoway project within budget and delivering a high-quality public space for Wayzata residents. This decision underscores the need for improved planning and communication as the project enters its final phases.
This article has been updated to reflect broader comments by the council members.
In a pivotal decision, the Wayzata City Council has voted down a proposed moratorium on redevelopment in the R-3A zoning district, a measure intended to give city officials time to evaluate the district’s redevelopment guidelines.
The moratorium, outlined in Ordinance 842A, would have temporarily halted projects in the district, but the second reading failed to pass during Monday night’s council meeting due to opposition from two members and the absence of a third.
Council Members Jeff Parkhill and Ken Sorenson voted against the measure, expressing concerns that a temporary freeze could result in unintended consequences for residents, property owners, and developers.
They argued that the moratorium might disrupt property sales, increase fees paid to architects, and impose holding costs on property owners, creating unnecessary burdens. Without Council Member Alex Plechash in attendance, the ordinance failed to secure the three votes needed for approval.
While concerns about traffic, infrastructure, and preserving the character of Wayzata’s neighborhoods have driven the conversation, Parkhill and Sorenson noted that they believed the moratorium was too extreme.
Both council members, along with their colleagues, acknowledged that redevelopment rules in the R-3A district should be reviewed, but they disagreed with halting all projects while that review is conducted.
Adding to the complexity, the Wayzata Planning Commission is already discussing broader redevelopment concerns within the R-3A district. The City has indicated that property owners potentially affected by any future policy changes may not be limited to the area near the Bell Tennis Courts, where recent attention has focused, but could include R-3A property owners city-wide.
This development broadens the scope of the discussion, raising new questions about how potential changes to zoning regulations may impact a larger group of stakeholders in Wayzata.
While the moratorium has been halted for now, the issue of redevelopment in the R-3A district remains at the forefront of city planning discussions, with further deliberation expected in the coming weeks.
The Wayzata City Council debates cannabis. Image courtesy Wayzata Community Television.
In accepting a dispensary business plan and approving consulting work for a municipal cannabis feasibility study, some members of the Wayzata City Council expressed reservations, given that the original goal of being the sole operator in Wayzata may no longer apply because municipal licenses don’t count toward population limits for licenses. The City may still seek to “diversify” revenues.
Acceptance of Municipal Dispensary Business Plan
On August 7, the Wayzata City Council accepted the first phase of the City’s Municipal Dispensary Business Plan, prepared by Point Seven Group.
The plan represents a significant step in the city’s efforts to explore the feasibility of operating a municipal cannabis dispensary, aligning with Wayzata’s strategic goals of diversifying revenue and maintaining community character and safety in the wake of Minnesota’s legalization of adult-use cannabis in 2023.
The Council reviewed findings from the dispensary business plan, which evaluated four scenarios for establishing the dispensary.
These scenarios included options ranging from utilizing a third-party delivery partner to managing delivery internally, with choices for either fully building out the dispensary or renovating a leased site.
All scenarios were projected to be profitable by year five, with the second scenario—using a third-party delivery partner and renovating a leased site—identified as the most feasible due to its lower barriers to entry and reduced upfront costs.
The first phase of the study was authorized at $15,000, funded by the city’s 2024 Capital Improvement Plan.
In a workshop held on June 4, the council had reached a consensus to continue exploring the feasibility of a municipal dispensary, which led to the acceptance of the first phase of the plan on August 7.
The City’s exploration of a municipal dispensary is part of its broader response to Minnesota’s cannabis legalization and aligns with its strategic priorities of revenue diversification and public safety.
The council’s acceptance of the plan indicates a cautious yet proactive approach to evaluating this new economic opportunity.
Prior to the vote council member Alex Plechash voiced his opposition to the City being in the recreational cannabis business, “…I’m philosophically opposed to the City getting into the business, so regardless of how good the business plan may be laid out, I’m not philosocally aligned with that, but I will vote to accept the report.”
Community Development Director Emily Goellner and City Manager Jeffrey Dahl reviewed the plan and recommended its acceptance, highlighting the importance of continued analysis to refine the financial model and stress-test the scenarios.
Feasibility Study
Shortly after accepting the Dispensary Plan, the Wayzata City Council voted 3-1 to approve a professional services agreement with Point Seven Group for the continuation of a feasibility study on a potential municipal cannabis dispensary.
The agreement, which encompasses Phases 2A and 2B of the study, totals $17,000 plus travel expenses and will be funded by the city’s Facilities Capital Improvement Plan.
The study, aimed at assessing the financial and operational viability of a municipal dispensary, is part of the city’s strategic priorities to diversify revenue and sustain community character and safety.
Phase 2A will involve updating the financial model, while Phase 2B will focus on operational preparedness.
The city anticipates making a final decision on whether to apply for a dispensary license in late 2024.
The council’s decision follows initial feasibility studies reviewed in June 2024 and reflects ongoing efforts to refine the financial model based on updates from the state’s Office of Cannabis Management.
Staff have also begun preparing for potential zoning ordinance updates to incorporate cannabis businesses, regardless of whether the city ultimately pursues the dispensary.
Council discussion
During the discussion, Mayor Johanna Mouton supported the approval of the contract, “We hire a lot of consultants as a small town, because we take on a lot of robust projects, we want the best to come to the table and assist us, we don’t have all of the staff for the grandiose ideas that we put forth, and Point 7 is so incredibly impressive, with their knowledge, with their professionalism, skillset, business oriented and minded, very impressive group.”
Council member Alex Plechash again voiced his opposition, “As I stated earlier, I have a philosophical opposition to the City or any government entity being in the business of endorsing or maybe even promoting the use of cannabis. I’ll say it again, I think this was a misguided piece of legislation that was passed, but it is what it is right now…. Just because we can do this doesn’t mean that we should do this, in my opinion.”
Plechash expressed displeasure that the City’s original plan to prevent another cannabis store from operating within city limits—similar to how the municipal liquor store operates—won’t work.
“…maybe the community doesn’t want it. We are going to get one, but do we really want two?”
Jeff parkhill
Council member Jeff Parkhill indicated more input from the community is needed, “I do think that maybe as a community, as a council, that there should be some sort of workshop that involves the police, and maybe the social worker that is with the police to get more information on how this is going to impact our community. It’s not just a financial decision, it’s potentially a moral and ethical decision also. I don’t know if I have a big problem with cannabis, but a lot of people do, I really think having a good chunk of our community supporting this next step would have been ideal, but definitely when we go for the application, that we should be really diligently working on that this fall with getting buy-in from our community because Alex [Plechash] may be completely right, maybe the community doesn’t want it. We are going to get one, but do we really want two [cannabis shops]?”
Further study by City staff showed that even if the City opens its own cannabis store, at least one other license may be granted because the municipal license doesn’t count against the license and population limits prescribed by the State of Minnesota.
City of Wayzata Community Development Director Emily Gellner clarified, “Now what has changed in the last few months is at first we thought we would be part of the lottery system, and we thought we would need to get in there and apply first, or we were confused where we would land, but where we have landed is that we are kind of in our own process completely, we are not part of that cap of one per town, we are not in that, we are on our own. So we could have a municipal store and one private retailer in town.”
After those comments, Council member Molly MacDonald questioned the projections, “I was very relieved to the stress testing portion of this agreement, on staff’s end. It’s crucially important for how their plans have shaken out, I see some serious red flags in there, it’s their business, so I have to trust it but I’m taking it with a rather large grain of salt… I’m very, very concerned about their revenue projections, I’m concerned about the lease agreements, I don’t think that’s right, so when you guys stress test, just test it hard.”
Approval
The feasibility study contract was subsequently approved 3-1 with Plechash voting against.
The work by Point 7 is expected to be completed by December of 2024.
Stay tuned to Wayzata.com on this developing story.
Ken Sorensen has been appointed to the Wayzata City Council, bringing with him extensive experience in both local governance and the commercial construction industry.
Submitted photo.
Sorensen’s Background
Sorensen, who has most recently served as Vice Chair of the Wayzata Planning Commission, will now help shape the future of the city in his new role on the council.
Sorensen’s professional background includes nearly 40 years with M.A. Mortenson Company, a commercial construction firm with revenues exceeding $500 million.
During his tenure, Sorensen held the position of Senior Vice President and continues to act as a Consultant, playing key roles in managing large-scale construction projects and guiding the company’s strategic growth.
In addition to his practical experience, Sorensen holds a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management and a Bachelor’s degree in Construction Engineering from Iowa State University.
His education and industry expertise are expected to bring valuable insights to the City Council, particularly as Wayzata continues to navigate its development and infrastructure needs.
With Iverson’s term set to expire at the end of this year, the City’s Charter mandates that the Council appoint a resident to fill the vacant seat.
During a workshop on July 23, the Council deliberated on how to proceed and decided to appoint a preferred candidate without conducting a broader solicitation and interview process, given the short time remaining in the term.
Appointment Process Diverged from Previous Selections
During the agenda item discussion, the Council and City staff acknowledged that appointing a candidate without soliciting applications differs from the process used in previous appointments.
City Manager Jeff Dahl recapped the previous workshop discussions from two weeks prior, “…the council discussed not necessarily who should be appointed but the process, and there were two options. One was the council should do a more thorough vetting process similar to what we have done in the past… …or should it just expedite the process if there are some good candidates there are appoximately four months left, do we need to kinda bypass and not be as thorough given the nature of the circumstances and move accordingly.”
Dahl indicated that the direction at the workshop was to consider the appointment at the first council meeting without soliciting applications, “So with that, based on the consensus from the workshop, staff would recommend that there is an appointment to fill that council term tonight.”
Unanimous Pick
Mayor Mouton indicated that the motivation to pick a candidate immediately was to be able to continue to process land use applications, “…for me what’s concerning and most important in terms of expediency in filling the spot are land use applications, we have applicants that have invested months if not years and thousands of dollars and have a tremendous amount of financial capital on the line, if a motion doesn’t pass because it’s a split vote, and there are only four of us, it doesn’t move forward.”
Council member Jeff Parkhill stated, “I think given that we are not going in a broad way… I think it’s important that we look at people that we know, that we have worked with, that we have experience with, thinking specifically that the two people that come to mind are people off the Planning Commission and I think that Ken Sorensen and Larissa Stockton would be really great additions to the Council.”
As the curtains draw to a close on 2023 and we embark on the journey that is 2024, it’s time to reflect on the events that shaped the Wayzata community, capturing the essence of a year marked by resilience, growth, and change.
In this comprehensive year in review, we will delve into the top stories that unfolded within our community, exploring the triumphs, setbacks, and notable moments that defined Wayzata’s journey throughout the past 12 months.
A $500,000 gift from the Carisch Family significantly boosted the Lakewalk construction and operations funding. Shortly thereafter Jennifer Zhi-Roth also pledged $500,000 to honor her late husband Gunther. Peter Hitch and the Wayzata Conservancy procured the major gifts to the City; and the City subsequently accepted the gifts with gratitude and thanks to the donors.
The Wayzata Gateway mixed use project, located at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Superior got underway after the Mithun Family initially received approval from the City of Wayzata for the development in 2022. Upon completion, the project will feature a modern and more compact Wells Fargo bank building, an office complex, along with 67 rental apartments, 9 townhomes, and a park.
After receiving multiple denials for the redevelopment of the former TCF Bank headquarters located at 200 East Lake Street, Lake West Development owner Curt Fretham initiated a lawsuit against the City of Wayzata seeking a neutral third party to weigh in on what can and should be allowed/built on the site.
In today’s economic landscape, coffee shops must adapt with a drive-through as part of their operations. Unfortunately, Caribou Coffee was denied a development application in 2022 for a new store on Wayzata Boulevard with such a drive through; sometime later the location on Lake Street in Wayzata shut its doors in January to the dismay of both Caribou Coffee and Wayzatans. Penny’s Coffee Shop also closed its doors citing trouble staffing the store.
Crew Car Wash opens
Ribbon cutting ceremony at Crew Car Wash. Image courtesy Wayzata Chamber.
Gerrish’s Car Wash underwent a complete transformation in 2023 after being sold and is now the revamped Crew Car Wash on Wayzata Boulevard. The Wayzata Chamber hosted a ribbon cutting in November.
Vegan burger joint Stalk and Spade closed its doors in November. Rumor has it serial entrepreneur and franchisor Steele Smiley will likely bring another restaurant concept to the building in the future.
Red Cow is a popular and upscale restaurant that serves gourmet burgers and wine among other things. It opened in October within the Promenade and near the Hotel Landing.
Anthropologie and the Promenade commenced litigation over rental rates and occupancy by other first class tenants within the commercial shopping development.
Wayzata Bait & Tackle closed in 2023 after 48 years in business, making way for a potential car dealership along the frontage road abutting Interstate 394 just into Minnetonka.
Wayzata Public Schools
Wayzata Public Schools announced $7 million budget shortfall in February
Superintendent Chace Anderson attributes budget challenges to the pandemic’s financial impact, decreased student enrollment, prolonged inadequate state funding for education, and inflationary pressures on operational functions like a 13% increase in the transportation budget.
Wayzata Public Schools are confronting financial challenges and seeking ways to trim the budget. One contemplated idea was to change the block schedule that has been in place since the 1990’s. This initial plan, intended to save $1.2 million through staff cuts, faced opposition from the community in the form of a petition bearing over 2,600 signatures as well as feedback from stakeholders delivered directly to Wayzata School Board members through emails, phone calls, and text messages.
Wayzata Public Schools acquired an office building for administration for $7.5 million
The Wayzata School District elected to purchase a 31,780 square foot office building for $7.75 million near Carlson Parkway and Xemium Lane to house its administration. The decision was made in February of 2023, and the transaction closed near the end of the year, according to an eCRV filed with the State of Minnesota. Officials indicate existing bond proceeds were utilized to pay for the building, so no funds came from the general fund.
CCX Media’s Kevin Miller reports on the purchase of the office building.
Three Wayzata School Board Members terms expired
Three Wayzata School Board members—Cheryl Polzin, Bonita Lucky, and Linda Cohen—conclude their combined 44 years of service at Wayzata Public Schools in December. Polzin, who had served most recently as Treasurer, has been chosen for the Minnesota School Board Association. Linda Cohen, the longest-serving member in the history of Wayzata Schools, finished her service as the Vice-Chair. The new Board members—Sheila Prior (re-elected), Paras Bhende, Dan Ginestra, and Valentina Eyres—will start their term on January 9, 2024.
Wayzata Trojans
Wayzata Boys Basketball won Class AAAA State Title in overtime
Third state title for Wayzata Boys Basketball after defeating Park Center at Target Center. Junior Jackson McAndrew scored 8 of Wayzata’s 9 points in the overtime to secured the 75-71 victory at Target Center.
4th consecutive State Title achieved for Wayzata Girls Volleyball
University of Minnesota recruit Olivia Swenson, a senior outside hitter, led a balanced attack with 14 kills and junior middle hitter Katie Kelzenberg added 10. Senior setter Stella Swenson, Olivia’s twin sister and fellow Gophers recruit, ran the show with 32 assists as Wayzata Girls Volleyball defeated New Prague in 3 straight sets to win the 4th consecutive State Title.
In the battle of last undefeated teams in the big-school field, Wayzata needed just 2 minutes and 12 seconds into the game to grab the lead it wouldn’t lose. Junior forward Aiden Judickas had the honors by scoring on a header off a corner kick by senior midfielder Charlie Piller. Those two combined again midway through the first half on a similar scoring play to double the Trojans’ advantage.
Wayzata Boys and Girls Cross Country won State
The Wayzata boys cross country team secured their unprecedented third consecutive Class AAA state title, marking a historic achievement for the program. Will Weber led the Trojans, finishing third with a time of 15:21, contributing to the team’s overall score of 63. Meanwhile, the Wayzata girls cross country team clinched their second consecutive state championship, guided by Jazleen Malherek-Osorio, who finished third overall in 18:00.
The Wayzata boys tennis team completed an outstanding season with a 5-2 win over Rochester Mayo in the state class AA championship match. The Trojans swept the singles matches on the way to the win. Wayzata finished undefeated against Minnesota teams this spring, with their only loss to a team from Illinois. It’s the fifth state title in program history for the Trojans. Courtesy CCX Media.
Wayzata History
Wayzata Historical Society merged into Lake Minnetonka Historical Society
Last but not least, you simply cannot forget about the Wayzata Chamber‘s annual events including James J. Hill Days, which includes big-time music shows known as the Wayzata Beach Bash–produced by Rick Born. This year the headliners were Brad Paisley & Cody Jinks, who put on awesome shows.
Other great Chamber events in 2023 included: the Wayzata Chilly Open, the Wayzata Art Experience, Wayzata Boo Blast, and more.
Hosted by the Wayzata Chamber, James J. Hill Days is an annual celebration in Wayzata, bringing the community together for a lively event filled with festivities, entertainment, and local charm. 2023 was an amazing celebration of everything that is Wayzata.
Lake Minnetonka is backdrop for Guiness Book of Records
330 people floated on individual pool noodles in Brown’s Bay on Lake Minnetonka in September to set a Guiness World Record. The event was hosted by Project Got Your Back, a Minnesota Foundation that helps to support veterans.
Conclusion
As we wrap up the Wayzata Year in Review for 2023, we invite you to join the conversation! Share your thoughts, agreements, disagreements, or any highlights we might have missed. Your input adds depth to our community narrative. Let’s continue celebrating Wayzata! Comment below and be a part of the discussion. Oh, and by the way – Happy New Year!
A pile driver and an excavator float on a pair of barges on Wayzata Bay. Photo by Daniel Gustafson.
The City of Wayzata held a “Sand Breaking” event to commerate the beginning of construction of the Lakewalk (Phase 2A) of the Panoway project on July 11th, 2023.
Sandbreaking video: Bob Ambrose, Molly MacDonald, Jeff Parkhill, Johanna Mouton, Jeff Buchanan.Scott Jordan of Civets addresses a crowd gathered to celebrate the beginning of construction the Cakewalk. Submitted photo by Jameson Johnson.City Manager Jeff Dahl speaks at the Sand Breaking. Submitted photo by Jamie Tjornehoj.A sign showing the future Lakewalk that will be built. Submitted photo by Jamie Tjornehoj.
Parking & density issues top Council concerns, redevelopment approval seems imminent
Lakewest Developmentowner Curt Fretham has been seeking to redevelop the former TCF headquarters lot for the past several years.
Each time the developer has been in front of the Wayzata Planning Commission & City Council, his proposals have been denied for various reasons.
Image courtesy Lakewest Development
Opposition in 2021 to the removal of the existing building was fierce with over 2,000 persons signing a petition supporting denial of any re- development in order to preserve the building.
Fretham’s latest plan was before the Wayzata City Council in late June and was again denied unanimously. The plan included 6 requests from the City including a rezoning to commercial use from the existing CUP.
The rationale behind the denial this time was related primarily to a plan to share parking stalls among condo owners and retail and office or daytime users.
However, the comments from the Council and community members seems to be shifting to- wards approval of a redevelopment of the site.
Becky Pierson, the President of the Wayzata Area Chamber of Commerce, indicated in public remarks that in reviewing the informa- tion in the application with the Chamber Board that, “…this is a large section of the west end that has been vacant for approximately 8 years 200 Lake Plan Denied, Again and probably 10 years by the time we get some approvals. We have had several developers that have tried to develop this very difficult lot, failed, and given up and it feels like this pro- posal has evolved to something that is accept- able…” Pierson continued, “I’m looking at this not at a detail level but from a very large corri- dor perspective, and the [Chamber] Board felt that… …[the City] should bring this applica- tion to approval and completion however you can do that.”
Council member Jeff Parkhill weighed in on the application, “I think you guys have nailed it on the look and feel, the design… …I think the scale of the property drives the parking needs, if it were smaller there would be less demand, so it’s kind of a self imposed problem for you guys.”
Council member Cathy Iverson stated, “Thank you for your resilience, because you have been after this for a while. I see you are not a quitter, and each time I think the appli- cation has gotten better. Thank you for that… …but I think the density is driving the parking issue.”
Council member Alex Plecash remarked, “Lots of pros to talk about tonight, but let me start with this: rezoning this makes sense to me. It absolutely should be rezoned in my opinion. Redevelopment is also very necessary for everyone involved. The big [issue] for me among all the parking issues is that residents Curt Fretham addresses the Wayzata City Council. Parking & density issues top Council concerns, redevelopment approval seems imminent would not have dedicated parking. If I was go- ing to buy a place that costs whatever it costs to live there, I would want to know that I had dedicated parking. There may be creative ways to fix that.”
Fretham responded, “I appreciate all the hard work and deliberation of the staff and the council and the outside third parties. The comp plan says to used a CUP for parking wherever possible, so we did that.”
Fretham will likely be back in front of the City with another application in the coming months.
Stay tuned to Wayzata.com for more information on this and other City business.
MacDonald won re-election after being appointed to Johanna Mouton‘s seat when she won the Mayor’s race. Parkhill most recently served as Planning Commission Chair. Jeff Buchanan did not seek re-election.
City Manager Jeff Dahl administers the oath of office to Jeff Parkhill.City Manager Jeff Dahl administers the oath of office to Molly MadDonald.
Wayzata.com recently reached out to the four candidates running for two City Council seats and asked them to weigh in on a number of topics including density versus charm, public safety and much more.
Chris Hickman, Molly MacDonald, Jeff Parkhill, and Larissa Stockton are the 2022 Council Candidates. (L-R)
Here, in alphabetical order by last name are their responses: (click the name to jump to that candidate)
Publisher’s note Candidates and members of the public may contact Wayzata.com publisher Dan Gustafson at (952) 473-1000 to request additional print copies for distribution.
Community Involvement: 3 years coaching director Wayzata traveling Soccer Club, 10 years coaching youth boys soccer, Leading a committee of four, representing the boat slip user of Wayzata lagoon. Spouse PTA president 2 years Wayzata Middle School
Previous Experience: I come from 3 generations of builders, I owned and managed an office building over 40,000 square feet for over 20 years. I understand issues related to owning and developing property.
Why are you running for city council? As a 40 year airline captain following a disciplined and methodical process for short and long term goals, I will bring the same standard and values in planning and development of our city.
What would be your top priorities as a Council Member? City planning is a complicated process. You are balancing wants and needs of the developers and the residents who I feel should come first. You cannot leave the development of our city to chance. The process needs order, balance and symmetry.
Please characterize crime and public safety in Wayzata: Over the last several year, with the increased development of our city and increased number of visitors, the city has experienced higher incidents of theft, vandalism, etc. I am aware of many incidents and concerns of the residents through the Next door and by communicating with many residents.
What measures, if any, would you propose or support to address public safety including both the police & fire departments? Obviously our city needs increased policing especially during the summer month and weekends. I have been working on a coordinated effort between the police and fire department to implement new approaches to increase their visibility without any expense to the tax payers.
How would you prioritize the competing interests from those who seek to develop Wayzata and increase density versus those who want to see Wayzata remain charming and smaller? Most residents agree that the Wayzata Charm no longer exists. The 3.10 Square Miles of Wayzata’s land is almost completely developed. To add new buildings, we must demolish another one. We can still control the level of growth and density with common sense approaches.
What would you say to members of the public who feel their voices are not heard, and how would you stay in touch with the public? I believe that the residents concerns and their input in the development process is an essential part of this process. I will maintain a web site during my term as an avenue to keep residents informed and to hear their concerns and input.
Do you have any examples of a time when you held a dissenting opinion in a professional setting? How did you approach voicing your stance in the face of disagreement? As an airline captain (wide bodied), I went through many Crew Resource Management courses and implemented this information at each flight with three other pilots in the cockpit and with a crew of 12 flight attendants. I understand that every crew member has the right to express their concerns and I have learned to respect other opinions and to value their input when making a decision. Listening is an art.
Community Involvement: I understand the Wayzata way of life. I’ve known it my entire life. I grew up here, I have invested my career here, my family is here. In 2017 I participated in a ‘think tank workshop’. I was 1 of 400 people who participated. I felt heard and I felt valued and it was a turning point in my community involvement. The outcome of those visioning exercises was the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Since then, I earned a seat on the Wayzata City Council and I look to that document and its guiding principles with every decision I make on the council. My experience on council has only deepened my commitment to serve. I now chair multiple committees, attend neighborhood and community events and I’m an active member of the Wayzata Chamber.
Previous Experience: I am the only candidate with experience on the Wayzata City Council. I’m accessible and engaged and I understand that residents come first. I listen and I am responsive. I am the only candidate with a business in Wayzata. I’m proud of my owner-operated retail store on Lake Street and it’s contribution to downtown Wayzata. I’m the only candidate who grew up in the community. I’m part of a multigenerational Wayzata family. My father in law served three terms on council and three more as mayor and my mother in law was a reporter for the Lakeshore Weekly. They encouraged me to get involved and to give back to the community.
Why are you running for city council? Two years ago I was appointed unanimously to the Wayzata City Council and many of you urged me to seek another term as Council Member. There are several important projects in Wayzata at various stages of completion. Such as, Phase 2a and 2b of Panoway on Wayzata Bay, development of the former TCF building site, and the Wayzata Boulevard Corridor Study to name a few. These are projects of great importance to Wayzata’s future and I want to see them to completion to ensure the values and vision of the residents will be considered during such a critical time.
What would be your top priorities as a Council Member? I will keep the city budget in line without sacrificing our city services. I will use policy to support our liquor operations. I can apply my expertise and understanding of retail in Wayzata to our the Muni Operations. I will support efforts to maximize the profits at the Wine & Spirits to offset our tax levy and increase funds for our parks, police and city services. I will continue to fund our police department to keep our roads and parks safe for the residents. I will support our Chief of Police and his short term, mid term and long term action plane to combat noise and safety on our roads. And finally, I will remain responsive to residents which are directly impacted by development proposals and the high growth rate in Wayzata. I will use our guiding principles to keep Wayzata a quiet, friendly and beautiful community.
Please characterize crime and public safety in Wayzata: We had a busy and sometimes noisy summer in downtown, but overall (100% of the 400 people surveyed this year) people feel safe in Wayzata. I aim to keep our roads, our parks, and our neighborhoods safe by supporting the police department.
What measures, if any, would you propose or support to address public safety including both the police & fire departments? There are many tactics I support to combat noise and safety in Wayzata. In the short term, the city can install speed signs and noise ordinance signs, promote “if you see something, say something” messaging, and parking a ‘spare squad’ on Lake St. In the mid term, we can increase our citation fee for noise ordinance, explore broader technology with cameras and noise detection, and explore gates on the upper level of the Mill St ramp. Longer term, I support adding 2 additional sworn officers to our force next year and training more officers for our bike patrol. Additionally, it’s worth considering a broader strategy to diversify revenues in order to fund public safety from visitors such as a sales tax. I will continue to support our Fire Department as we consider a new full time fire chief, considering and planning for long term investments to our fleet, and encouraging new volunteers to join our Volunteer Fire Department.
How would you prioritize the competing interests from those who seek to develop Wayzata and increase density versus those who want to see Wayzata remain charming and smaller? The high growth rate remains a top concern of the residents. I will look at development proposals through the lens of the residents. Development should support their vision and their values. I will adhere to the public process to ensure transparency and encourage community engagement and feedback. My decisions will remain weighted toward the residents when developers deviate from our standards. I will continue to listen, be accessible and come to every meeting prepared and educated on agenda items.
What would you say to members of the public who feel their voices are not heard, and how would you stay in touch with the public? Please continue to voice your opinions and give feedback. I’m listening. My role on council is to represent the entire community and the residents come first, period. I invite members of the community to reach out to me directly, participate in neighborhood meetings/events, sign up for the city wide email list, join a committee or a commission. If you feel you aren’t being heard, let’s change that together. We can find a way to get you involved and be heard.
Do you have any examples of a time when you held a dissenting opinion in a professional setting? How did you approach voicing your stance in the face of disagreement? I was the only council member to vote against a parking variance on Lake Street this Summer. I remained steadfast in my knowledge of Lake Street. I assured the public and my colleagues that I have a front row seat to downtown Wayzata and that my dissenting vote was in the best interest of the community.
Community Involvement: Wayzata Planning Commission – 4 yrs – Currently Chairman Wayzata Zoning Studies Task Force Wayzata Blvd. Corridor Study Task Force Wayzata Community Docks Task Force JDRF Twin Cities Board of Directors – 4 yrs Breck School Board of Trustees – 3 years
Previous Experience: MY BUSINESS BACKGROUND POSITIONS ME STRONGLY TO ADD VALUE QUICKLY IN COUNCIL: • Proven track record on Planning …You know how I have voted for the past 4 years • Former CPA – Fiscal austerity is my specialty…as it relates to our $20 mil city budget & tax levy. I can help! • 37 yrs. of business and real estate experience • High ethical standards and a willingness to embrace the true essence of the Wayzata code of conduct.
Why are you running for city council? TO SERVE MY COMMUNITY…PERIOD! – “Service is the rent we pay for being…..” Marian Wright Edelman. Our lakes and small-town feel are what make Wayzata one of the most wonderful places to live globally…it is a WORLD CLASS CITY and a true GEM. I want to make sure the community gets a VOICE in the future of this remarkable city…. Work with me to keep WAYZATA EXTRAORDINARY! #PROTECTWAYZATA
What would be your top priorities as a Council Member? My priorities: • SMALL TOWN SMALL DEVELOPMENTS – building mass & scale must fit the location and be charming. If not, I VOTE NO! • BALANCE RESIDENT AND BUSINESS INTERESTS: 1. How to handle the additional traffic, noise, & parking complaints? 2. How to pay for maintenance and incremental wear & tear on our community? 3. Our downtown is struggling under the influx of new visitors. • PRIORITIZE LOCAL VOICES: All local property tax payers are my priority.
Please characterize crime and public safety in Wayzata. Crime is on the rise…with a major altercation between an adult and a young man last weekend. Wallets stolen out of purses at CoV. Let’s get this under control before it moves off Lake Street and into the neighborhoods and personal residences.
What measures, if any, would you propose or support to address public safety including both the police & fire departments? I agree with Council’s decision to expand the police force. Regain control of Lake St. by issuing tickets for show-off driving and modified mufflers, Lower the speed limit to 25 on Lake st.. Install license plate readers that trigger a greeting by Wayzata police for those that have caused prior problems. Stronger police presence.
How would you prioritize the competing interests from those who seek to develop Wayzata and increase density versus those who want to see Wayzata remain charming and smaller? I believe my voting record shows that I weight what neighbors and the people most affected by a development or a variance over the specific project. I am not anti-development at all, but I do believe that scale and mass must fit the site and the building must be charming or i vote NO!.
What would you say to members of the public who feel their voices are not heard, and how would you stay in touch with the public? My third priority above is to Prioritize Local Voices. If you are a property tax payer in Wayzata, you are my priority. My email is Jeffparkhillforwayzata@gmail.com and my cell is 612-699-1051
Do you have any examples of a time when you held a dissenting opinion in a professional setting? How did you approach voicing your stance in the face of disagreement? This happens on the Wayzata Planning commission every meeting. I am the Chair and seek out and appreciate opposing views. This helps us all get to the best answer for each issue that comes in front of us. I am a unifying voice and can certainly handle opposing views and stand my ground if i feel strongly another way.
Community Involvement: Serving and connecting to our community is very important to me. Currently, I serve as Vice Chair of the Wayzata Planning Commission, member of the Zoning Study Task Force, the Design Study Task Force, and the Corridor Study Committee. These various roles have help me gain a greater understanding of Wayzata City Government and the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. I am also active in my children’s school. Currently, I serve on The School Committee in their High School and volunteer in other capacities as well.
Previous Experience: Beyond my experience in Wayzata, I have run my own design practice and custom kitchen retail store in London, worked in residential renovation design and development, and have done business strategy and design consultation services internationally and locally. Previous to this, I worked for Andersen Consulting NYC and London offices in Change Management Strategy Consulting. I hold a Bachelors in Business Management & Marketing and a Masters in Architectural Interior Design. These skills have been valuable in my work with the city.
Why are you running for city council? As a Mom of three teenagers, I am focused on keeping Wayzata safe and enjoyable for generations to come. I am here all year long, all the time, and committed to seeing Wayzata thrive in all seasons. We love Wayzata because it is a safe and friendly lakeside community where everyone knows your name. On my daily walks with my dog, I enjoy the intimate feeling of charm that we must strive to protect. Some folks believe this is already lost, but I know we must keep an eye on our vision going forward to define and maintain the Wayzata Way of Life – prioritizing the daily experience of the Wayzata resident.
What would be your top priorities as a Council Member? SAFETY: Support needed resources for our amazing Police & Fire Departments. BUDGETING: Increase transparency and identify creative solutions to maximize tax dollars & manage a balance of seasonal cost drivers. COMMUNITY: Enhance connected walkability, fully utilize Panoway & community amenities. HOUSING: Work creatively to identify strategies for needed affordable housing opportunities. DEVELOPMENT: Mindful sustainable development focusing on our resident’s wants & needs, addressing traffic, noise & parking.
Please characterize crime and public safety in Wayzata. An increase in interest in Wayzata and its picturesque location, as well as broader migration trends, have brought an increase in traffic, congestion, noise and unfortunately crime. All of this impacts our community. We must proactively and iteratively set policy and tone of our environment and shared spaces so our community members are safe as they enjoy the experience of Wayzata daily life.
What measures, if any, would you propose or support to address public safety including both the police & fire departments? I would support an increase in police force numbers to address the influx of visitors we have in Wayzata daily. I would support the institution of a sales tax to provide resources for Police and Fire Departments. I would support foot/bike patrolling police presence in our shared areas at key times. Uniformed officers may also include a volunteer program that adds presence and sets tone; particularly in the Lake Street area and shopping centers. I would look for imminent ways to decrease speed along our roadways both through beautiful visual demarkation of town entrances as well as speed management tools that may or may not be permanent.
How would you prioritize the competing interests from those who seek to develop Wayzata and increase density versus those who want to see Wayzata remain charming and smaller? Lake Minnetonka, a superbly beautiful natural resource, is the foundation of Wayzata’s unique beauty and attraction. We must protect our foundation. Priority should take root formation on protecting our Lake, its views and access. We must never cast a shadow on our gem of a lakeside community and therefore be highly conscientious around height, massing, and density as we change over time. These items directly impact the health of our Lake. We must clarify our vision requirements in our code to ensure it is implemented. We can be proactive in identifying facades, buildings or parks we wish to preserve as established in size or scale today. We must look for creative solutions to add housing we need for all families that does not compromise or overshadow lake life simplicity. We must focus our vision of Wayzata around the daily experience of our resident’s quality of life.
What would you say to members of the public who feel their voices are not heard, and how would you stay in touch with the public? Attending council meetings, reading local news, and watching CCTV are important ways to stay informed. I have launched a feedback button on my website for anyone to comment, connect or add thoughts on how they define the Wayzata Way of Life. This is something that I will continue after I am elected. I am also out in the community daily year round, walking my dog and visiting with friends and neighbors. I am always open for a conversation with residents to hear their thoughts and concerns. I have made it a priority to meet with people from every aspect of our community to hear their perspectives and broaden my own. You will find I am always available and transparent with our residents about any topic.
Do you have any examples of a time when you held a dissenting opinion in a professional setting? How did you approach voicing your stance in the face of disagreement? ‘Approach’ in service work is key. When we address complex topics, it is important to come to the table without assumptions or prescriptive solutions. Dialogue and exchange of ideas without a preconceived ‘answer’ is the best formula to analyze the many facets of an issue and maximize the outcomes of a decision. It’s important to ask questions, seek understanding, pause before reacting, and run scenarios to assess the impact of any one decision upon the greater whole.
You must be logged in to post a comment.