WAYZATA — The Wayzata City Council is set to meet in closed session Tuesday night as the city confronts the fallout from a Hennepin County ruling that voided its short-term rental ban and considers whether to impose an emergency moratorium on new short-term rentals.
According to the public notice, the closed special meeting is scheduled for April 7, 2026, at 7:30 p.m., or shortly after the regular council meeting, under the attorney-client privilege exception in Minnesota’s Open Meeting Law. The notice says the closed session is for the council to meet with its attorneys regarding litigation brought by property owners against the city over its short-term rental ordinance.
The litigation stems from Ordinance 852, adopted last fall, which prohibited short-term rentals under the city’s rental dwelling licensing code. In an order filed March 30, Judge Joseph R. Klein held that Ordinance 852 “is a zoning ordinance,” that Wayzata was required to follow the procedural requirements of the Minnesota Municipal Planning Act, and that because it did not, the ordinance is “void.”
City staff is now asking the council to declare an emergency need for a temporary halt on new short-term rentals and to approve a first reading of Ordinance 859, described in the agenda report as “an Emergency Interim Ordinance Imposing an Immediate One Year Moratorium on New Short-Term Rentals Pending Study and Consideration of Amendments to the City’s Regulations and Official Controls.”
The agenda report says staff recommends adoption of the ordinance. It states that, after the court’s decision, the city needs time to study how short-term rentals should be addressed through its zoning ordinance and other official controls, especially given what staff described as the “potential for increased demand for new STR license applications.”
Under the draft ordinance, the city council would declare “an immediate, pressing, and emergency need” for a moratorium on new short-term rentals following the court order that voided Ordinance 852. The proposed measure would direct city staff to study whether the city’s zoning and subdivision ordinances should be revised to address short-term rentals.
The moratorium, if adopted, would last 12 months and would apply to any new short-term rental use in the city. The draft defines a short-term rental as occupancy of less than 30 consecutive calendar days. It would not apply to rentals with dwelling licenses that were active and in good standing either on the effective date of the new ordinance or on the effective date of Ordinance 852.
The draft goes further than pausing applications. It says the city would not “accept, issue or process any application of any kind” related to new short-term rentals during the moratorium, and that any such application received would be denied.
Staff also outlined how the vote would matter. The agenda report says the moratorium would begin immediately only if at least four of the five council members vote to declare an emergency in the ordinance preamble. Otherwise, if approved by a simple majority, it would take effect only after a second reading at a later meeting and publication.
The court order did not decide every issue raised in the lawsuits. Judge Klein declined, for now, to rule on the plaintiffs’ nonconforming-use claim and did not reach the takings issue, both because Ordinance 852 had already been found void.
Tuesday’s closed session signals the city is weighing its legal options, while the proposed moratorium suggests officials may try to prevent any expansion of short-term rentals while they reset the ordinance process through a zoning study and possible code changes.
In a phone interview this morning, Mayor Andrew Mullin clarified that elected officials are considering the appropriate next moves, both legally and from a policy standpoint including the requests from staff.
“The city is evaluating its options, including an appeal of the court case, the requested moratorium, appropriate zoning measures, and allowing short term rentals for responsible operators. Policymakers will evaluate staff’s recommendations and determine the next steps in both the public council meeting and closed session.”
Stay tuned to Wayzata.com for more on this issue as it develops.
This story was updated to reflect Mayor Mullin’s comments.








You must be logged in to post a comment.