Subdivision Proposal on Gleason Lake Road Delayed as Developer Seeks Time to Address Neighborhood Concerns

WAYZATA — A proposed subdivision at 190 Gleason Lake Road and 121 Gleahaven Road will return to the Wayzata City Council next month after the developer requested additional time to work with nearby residents and address concerns raised during the review process.

During a recent council meeting, city officials noted that the applicant’s attorney had requested the item be tabled until April 21, 2026, postponing consideration of Resolution 14-2026, which would formally deny the preliminary plat. The council amended its agenda to reflect the request.

Lake West Development has proposed a 4 lots subdivision off of Gleason Lake Road.

The proposal, submitted by Lake West Development, seeks to subdivide two existing residential parcels near the entrance to Gleahaven Road into four single-family home sites. According to the developer’s attorney, the proposal complies with the dimensional standards of Wayzata’s R-3 zoning district, including requirements for lot size, width, density, and impervious surface coverage.

In a letter to the city, attorney Megan C. Rogers of Larkin Hoffman, representing the applicant, wrote that the proposed subdivision satisfies the objective requirements of the zoning code and aligns with the density framework outlined in Wayzata’s Comprehensive Plan.

The four proposed parcels would average approximately 15,363 square feet, which the applicant argues falls within the range of existing lot sizes in the surrounding neighborhood.

Despite those arguments, the Wayzata Planning Commission has recommended denial of the preliminary plat, citing concerns tied to the city’s subdivision ordinance. Those concerns include the project’s relationship to the character of the surrounding neighborhood, as well as questions related to grading, topography, and preservation of natural features on the site.

Developer Seeks Time for Dialogue

The request to delay the council vote was made through the applicant’s attorney and provides time for the developer to continue discussions with neighbors and consider whether modifications could address concerns raised during the public review process.

Subdivision proposals in established neighborhoods often involve multiple layers of review, including both the measurable standards contained in the zoning code and broader planning considerations outlined in the city’s subdivision ordinance.

Neighborhood Residents Voice Opposition

Several residents of Gleahaven Road submitted written comments and a petition asking the city to deny the proposal.

The petition argues that replacing two existing homes with four new residences could significantly change the character of the small cul-de-sac neighborhood and require the removal of mature trees. Petitioners also raised concerns about drainage, grading, and the overall scale of the development compared with surrounding properties.

In a letter to the city, Ryan Schultz of 108 Gleahaven Road wrote that his family chose the neighborhood because of its quiet setting and mature tree canopy, stating that replacing two homes with four would permanently alter the feel of the street.

Other residents cited traffic and safety concerns near the intersection of Gleahaven Road and Gleason Lake Road, where sight lines are limited by the hill and curve along the roadway and where children often wait for school buses.

In a separate letter, Pete Trinh and Morgan Kaufman of 167 Gleahaven Road said the addition of four homes could increase traffic and change the established character of the cul-de-sac.

Residents Kumar and Kathy Das Gupta of 110 Gleahaven Road also expressed concerns about potential impacts to neighborhood safety and property values if the subdivision were approved.

Recent Decisions Provide Context

The debate over the Gleason Lake Road subdivision comes amid several recent land-use decisions in Wayzata where questions about zoning standards and subdivision review have drawn public attention.


In 2025, the city denied the proposed Ferndale Bluffs subdivision, which the developer argued met zoning requirements. The developer later filed a lawsuit challenging that decision. The dispute was ultimately resolved through a settlement, and the Wayzata City Council approved the final plat in January 2026.


Earlier this year, the council also approved a conditional use permit and variance for a two-family home at 220 Central Avenue South, even though the parcel did not meet the standard dimensional requirements typically required for a duplex.


In another case in 2023, the council declined to approve a three-lot subdivision on East Lake Street, despite the applicant’s argument that the proposal met base zoning standards.


In 2017 developer K.C. Chermark of Pillar Homes received an approval for a similar development at the corner of LaSalle and Central.

Taken together, those cases illustrate the balance cities often weigh between objective zoning requirements—such as lot size and density—and broader planning considerations, including neighborhood character and natural site conditions.

Next Step

With the Gleason Lake Road proposal now tabled, the Wayzata City Council is expected to revisit the preliminary plat on April 21.

In the interim, the developer and nearby residents may continue discussions about the proposal and whether revisions could address the concerns raised during the public review process.

The council will ultimately determine whether to uphold the Planning Commission’s recommendation of denial or allow the subdivision to proceed.


Discover more from Wayzata.com

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Leave a Reply

Discover more from Wayzata.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Wayzata.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get full access.

Continue Reading